grams., geographic area, measurement out of MA, measurement from mathematics overall performance, sex, levels top, and you may guide season), i presented the newest heterogeneity attempt. The new Q try (heterogeneity shot) are finding the differences certainly feeling types, thus to explore which possible moderator (i.e., data has) might have starred a job in these differences is actually expected.
Geographical Area
Geographic regions were sensed a prospective reasonable basis. The effect sizes were classified towards the four large groups: You, European countries, Asia or any other counties. The latest analytical heterogeneity one of many impact sizes try shown (Q = , p = 0.01). Specifically, the studies that have Western products met with the premier perception size (r = ?0.41), as the degree having Western european trials exhibited the littlest effect size (roentgen = ?0.21). Simultaneously, the research around products got more substantial perception size (r = ?0.30) compared to involved classification during the Europe, as they got an inferior effect proportions compared to corresponding group when you look at the Asia.
Gender
The new reasonable analyses towards the gender was basically presented as a result of a couple of measures. First, the category about changeable is in keeping with Ma’s (1999) data, and then we compared perhaps the mathematics anxiety-performance link is rather different certainly one of around three kinds (men, ladies, and you may combined); the results ideal there were zero distinctions one of many around three categories (Q = cuatro.62, p = 0.099). 2nd, this study had a tendency to increase next to check on when you should prohibit the latest confuse impression about mixed group and you will perhaps the mediocre correlations ranging from men and women was basically notably some other. Only eight studies you to definitely provided the latest correlation ranging from MA and you can math overall performance or necessary data would-be gone to live in impact products getting different sexes had been integrated. The outcomes advised zero factor ranging from people (roentgen = ?0.30) and you may males (roentgen = ?0.18) (Q = dos.73, p = 0.098).
Degrees Peak
Four amount-level groups was molded contained in this meta-research, and additionally a simple group, junior higher class, older higher class, combine group, and you can college or university category. The outcomes recommended so it varying got high outcomes into the math anxiety-abilities connect (Q = , p = 0.02). A lot more particularly, the elderly large classification encountered the largest math stress-abilities link (r = ?0.44), accompanied by the fresh new junior higher class (r = ?0.39), school (roentgen = ?0.33), elementary (roentgen = ?0.27), and you will mixed group, which had the tiniest mathematics nervousness-abilities hook up (roentgen = ?0.21).
Guide Ages
The modern meta-data contains the amount of time frame regarding 19 decades (2000–2018). To evaluate whether or not day got an impact on the newest math nervousness-abilities hook up, a good Pearson correlation is conducted involving the book age together with of all of the individual degree (r = 0.27, p > 0.05). No correlation try receive anywhere between effect sizes additionally the publication age (Shape cuatro).
Dimensions from MA
I also searched perhaps the balances familiar with attempt mathematics nervousness got an impact on the latest mathematics stress-results link. The outcomes advised your dimensions out of MA didn’t come with feeling toward math stress-show hook (Q = 6.54, p = 0.48). Particularly, private degree which used almost every other bills (e.g., the fresh Math Anxiety Measure to own Basic College People [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] met with the prominent mathematics nervousness-efficiency link (r = ?0.41), accompanied by education that used the latest MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (r = ?0.35), MAQ (roentgen = ?0.28), MASYC (roentgen = ?0.26), CMAQ (r = chat hour dating ?0.24), SEMA (r = ?0.24), and you can AMAS (roentgen = ?0.24), and you may personal degree that used the newest MASC encountered the smallest math anxiety-efficiency link (r = ?0.15).
Dimensions out-of Math Performance
The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).